<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaglue &#187; Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaglue.com.au/category/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaglue.com.au</link>
	<description>Full service marketing that sticks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>How loyal are your customers?</title>
		<link>http://mediaglue.com.au/2009/05/how-loyal-are-your-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://mediaglue.com.au/2009/05/how-loyal-are-your-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mediaglue.com.au/mediaglue_new/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two-thirds (65%) of retailers currently lack fully automated loyalty tools at the point-of-sale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-158" title="So many choices." src="http://dev.mediaglue.com.au/mediaglue_new/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/kid_ball1.jpg" alt="So many choices." width="510" height="340" /></p>
<p>Two-thirds (65%) of retailers currently lack fully automated loyalty tools at the point-of-sale, and both card and non-card loyalty programmes need to be simplified for retail employees, according to a survey of 165 retailers by <strong>Aberdeen Group</strong>*.<span id="more-150"></span></p>
<p>This inadequacy at the point of sale suggests that there is a significant gap between customer service processes and technologies at the focal point of retail customer service. Considering that the store still accounts for the greatest share of sales for the average multi-channel retailer, this gap undermines the retailer’s ability to build long-term, profitable customer relationships.</p>
<p>The report, entitled <strong>‘Cutting edge customer loyalty: Retail best practices’,</strong> also found that 50% of the best-in-class retailers identified already use fully automated loyalty processes at the point of sale, which are responsible for improved performance metrics such as a 16% year-on-year increase in customer retention.<br />
The company’s original ‘Responsive Customer Loyalty’ report in June 2008 showed that loyalty has become one of the most critical factors that impact retailers’ sales and customer retention performance. But in order to ensure effective results, loyalty platforms and points solutions need to be combined with the key loyalty-related process workflow functions: planning, implementation, evaluation, and analysis.</p>
<p>The focus of large retail companies has largely been on the upgrade of legacy loyalty systems that are five to ten years old, or sometimes even older. These systems require constant updates for new loyalty scenarios and business attributes and, in the past three years, both ERP and best-of-breed loyalty companies have turned their focus toward providing loyalty solutions for small and medium-size retailers. These segments are most likely to grow and adopt loyalty solutions within the next two years, while large retailers will continue to update, improve, and adopt solutions that are function-specific (such as CRM, business intelligence, personalised e-mail, gift cards, private label credit cards, and rewards cards).</p>
<p>Interestingly, the 2008 report indicated that the top pressure for 58% of best-in-class retailers was the need to develop Customer Lifetime Value (CLV), which was defined by the report as “the present value of future cash flow through long-term customer relationships”.</p>
<p>However, in 2009, year the top pressure facing 61% of companies is the pressure of survival in global recessionary conditions that have changed the consumer spending landscape and made it more unpredictable than ever. Moreover, the second biggest business challenge (for 35% of best-in-class retailers) is the need to reduce customer acquisition costs in a recessionary market that is characterised by the high cost of goods sold. Best-in-class businesses cited the following key pressures:</p>
<p>1. Increased competition in a tough economy: 61%;<br />
2. Need to reduce customer acquisition costs: 35%;<br />
3. Need to reduce customer retention costs: 30%;<br />
4. Need to increase brand awareness: 22%.</p>
<p>Among the 2009 survey’s key findings and recommendations for retailers:</p>
<p>* 90% of the best-in-class retailers indicated some level of success from their loyalty programmes. In contrast, less than one-third of Industry Average and Laggard retailers reported success from their programmes;</p>
<p>* Best-in-class retailers were found to be 1.8 times more likely than Laggards to develop customer behaviour-based promotions that ultimately drive greater loyalty;</p>
<p>* Best-in-class companies were also found to be 70% more likely than their peers to develop multi-tier rewards plans for their most profitable customers.</p>
<p>* In order to achieve best-in-class performance, retailers should conduct customer wallet share and market basket analysis, measure the net profit margin impact of customer loyalty expenditure, adopt rules-based and POS-integrated customer loyalty systems, and upgrade their loyalty infrastructure on an annual basis.</p>
<p>The 2009 survey also found that grocery, department stores, luxury, and retail financial service institutions are particularly affected by the need to reduce customer acquisition costs. In the entire customer loyalty lifecycle process, the acquisition of a customer is the most difficult and expensive process, due largely to a fiercely competitive retail landscape. In today’s down economy, customer acquisition costs are even more risky due to uncertain consumer spending and downward pressure on both prices and margins.</p>
<p>Currently, with same-store sales in decline, retailers are using every possible price-based ‘customer pull’ strategy to drive incremental sales through untapped customer segments that have any amount of buying power. Such short-term customer acquisition tactics drive costs upward as retailers sacrifice their net profit margin to increase sales volume.</p>
<p>According to Sahir Anand, analyst for Aberdeen Group, the difference between the 2008 and 2009 customer loyalty-related business pressures is primarily due to current market conditions which have led retailers to adopt desperate, short-term tactics to survive the downturn rather than focusing on long-term customer relationships.</p>
<p><span style="color:#999; font-size:11px;">For more information about customer loyalty programs, gift cards and referral programs, please call us on 1300 139 467 or fill out the Contact form and we’ll discuss how you can have your own customer loyalty program, gift cards and referral program.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.aberdeen.com/" target="_self">*Aberdeen Group</a></p>
<p>Update: May 29. For a comprehensive report on Customer Loyalty, see this article from <a title="Aberdeen Group on Customer Loyalty" href="http://www.dynamicrewards.info/files/best-practices-for-acquiring-etc.pdf" target="_blank">Aberdeen Group</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediaglue.com.au/2009/05/how-loyal-are-your-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are your leads costing you too much?</title>
		<link>http://mediaglue.com.au/2009/05/are-your-leads-costing-you-too-much/</link>
		<comments>http://mediaglue.com.au/2009/05/are-your-leads-costing-you-too-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 07:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mediaglue.com.au/mediaglue_new/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do people continue with high-cost, high-risk lead generation when there is a better way?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-142" title="Fishing for leads." src="http://dev.mediaglue.com.au/mediaglue_new/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/fishing1.jpg" alt="Fishing for leads." width="510" height="458" /></p>
<p>Why do people continue with high-cost, high-risk lead generation when there is a better way?</p>
<p>Let me ask you a simple yet profound question: If I banned you, effective from today, from making another cold call, would your business survive?<span id="more-137"></span></p>
<p>A cold call is any unsolicited sales call or visit you make. In other words, where you intrude upon or interruct the prospect to make your “pitch”.</p>
<p>Like this one I just received…</p>
<p><em>Hello this is Gina, I’m calling from XYZ telecom. Can I speak to the owner of the business please?</em></p>
<p>(Me, knowing what was coming next) She isn’t here right now.</p>
<p><em>OK, I’ll speak with the manager then, is that you?</em></p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p><em>As the manager then, you’d be able to make decisions about your telephone calls then. I’m calling to tell you how… </em>(I interrupted)</p>
<p>Gina, I’m sorry, I’m not prepared to do business with telemarketers. I don’t know who your Company is or where you are, and I have no interest in changing carriers, thank you.</p>
<p><em>But sir, you must listen to me…</em></p>
<p>No, I mustn’t. Thank you, goodbye.</p>
<p>I hung up.</p>
<p>How many times every day does Gina get this?</p>
<p>What’s more to the point, how many times every day are <strong>you</strong> or <strong>your staff</strong> getting this?</p>
<p>Let’s assume you have a target market of 250,000 people. You employ five telemarketers to each make 200 calls per day; that’s 5,000 calls per week. In 12 months, you’ve called every prospect in your marketplace.</p>
<p>Let’s assume each telemarketer makes just one appointment per day. That’s 25 appointments made per week, not quite enough to keep your two salespeople busy, but too much for one.</p>
<p>They each make a sale for every three calls which is about four sales each per week.</p>
<p>Eight sales per week equates to 400 sales per year. Out of 250,000 marketing messages, 249,600 have said “No”. You’ve had a 0.15% conversion rate. Low, isn’t it? And at what cost?</p>
<p>Five telemarketers at $20 per hour is $100 per hour. With each working 30 hours, that’s $3000 per week in wages, or $150,000 per year. Now add call costs, rent and all the other employment overheads. This takes the total to around $200,000. That means that each of the 400 sales cost you $500 in telemarketing costs alone. Now add cost of goods sold, commissions for the salespeople and your other overheads and costs…</p>
<p>Not looking very pretty is it?</p>
<p>Let’s say your average sale is $4,000 and your cost of goods is 50% or $2000. Add 10% commission and cost of telemarketing (totals $900); add all your other costs and you’re on a hiding to nothing.</p>
<p>Is there another way?</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p>Several in fact; and they work very well. What’s more, they can reduce your cost per lead down to a few dollars or in some cases, a few cents.</p>
<p>If you’re in Australia and would like to know how to get leads quickly, for lower cost and with higher conversions rates than with telemarketing (or just about any other form of marketing), call us now on 1300 884 757.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediaglue.com.au/2009/05/are-your-leads-costing-you-too-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
